Page 1 of 2

Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 2:33 am
by Brian Ostlind
So much awesome.

Image

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:09 am
by Scott Boyd
Just WOW!

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:39 am
by Armortek
Think you need a trip to Militracks next year Brian :)
Kian

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:55 pm
by Peter Curran
Trun , near Falaise .

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 11:04 am
by Chris Hall
Peter Curran wrote:
Thu May 30, 2019 10:55 pm
Trun , near Falaise .

Thought it would be somewhere around Falaise. Not so heavenly for the Germans, then ..... :?

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:14 pm
by Brian Ostlind
1945

Image

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:40 pm
by Vince Cutajar
What's that one with number 898? Pz3 or Pz4?

Vince

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:43 pm
by Brian Ostlind
Probably pz4 the gun barrel looks to be larger than any pz3 variant. I don’t know how many pz3s were even around after the war.

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:03 pm
by Vince Cutajar
Pz4 is my second favourite after the Tiger 1. I guess it's from my childhood days when I used to do Airfix models and used to play with them until they broke. Then I would try to convince my father to buy me a new one. He was more into airplanes and ships.

Vince

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:22 pm
by Stephen White
Sorry Brian, that's just a load of old Wehrmacht junk, shot to pieces by 17 pdrs and air to ground rockets. This is really heaven......

00527058a6c3f0b7580543d403e94b1e.jpg
00527058a6c3f0b7580543d403e94b1e.jpg (120.92 KiB) Viewed 2610 times
DSC05366.jpg
DSC05382.jpg

Sorry, couldn't resist it. Mind you, if you had the contents of your photo available today, you would be a very rich man indeed.

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 9:20 pm
by mark lawson
I'm surprised at you Steven, air to ground rockets were wildly inaccurate the British in 1944 conducted trials with a captured Panther painted white and placed in the middle of an open field, another words a perfect target the RAF then tried to hit the Panther firing a broadside of rockets from all four directions, the results were not good and favoured the Panther if memory serves me right there was less than a 5% chance of being hit by angle rocket from a full salvo of eight rockets on the other hand if a rocket did hit then the results were devastating, being hit by a bomb had even worse results estimations was it took 800 rockets or 3500 bombs to hit a tank in ca combat situation.

I came across a post some years ago by Michael Kenny, try as I have I cant find the post.

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 10:54 pm
by Brian Ostlind
What would be the most effective anti tank weapon for a plane to mount? Canons?

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2019 11:35 pm
by mark lawson
20mm cannons on a Plane were ineffective against armour .50cal even less effective even though US pilots claimed that bouncing rounds off the floor into the belly of a Panzer would knock it out this was not the case not a single German tank was lost to this method even though hundreds of kills were claimed.

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:54 am
by Brian Ostlind
So carpet bombing I’m guessing then.

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2019 8:02 am
by Chris Hall
Who says you actually have to destroy a tank ? You just need to cause enough peripheral damage (break a track, damage a periscope) to make the crew bail out. Concussion from a near miss could do that, or sheer terror (being under rocket attack would do it for me !).

And there's a world of difference between trying to hit a single vehicle in a field (whatever colour it's painted), and a choked area like Faliase which must have been the ultimate "target rich environment".