Heaven. 1944.

Use this area for an off topic conversations not related to Armortek or Kompact Kits. Please ensure that you abide by the forum rules.
User avatar
Brian Ostlind
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:56 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Has liked: 617 times
Been liked: 1191 times

Heaven. 1944.

Post by Brian Ostlind »

So much awesome.

Image
epic

Scott Boyd
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2019 4:43 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Scott Boyd »

Just WOW!

User avatar
Armortek
Site Admin
Posts: 2317
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:30 am
Location: Winchester, England
Been liked: 1082 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Armortek »

Think you need a trip to Militracks next year Brian :)
Kian
Armortek

Peter Curran
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 6:29 pm
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Peter Curran »

Trun , near Falaise .

User avatar
Chris Hall
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:34 pm
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire, UK
Has liked: 216 times
Been liked: 272 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Chris Hall »

Peter Curran wrote:
Thu May 30, 2019 10:55 pm
Trun , near Falaise .

Thought it would be somewhere around Falaise. Not so heavenly for the Germans, then ..... :?
Mark IV (Liesel, Abteilung 14, France 1918)
Morris Quad, 25-pdr & 2 x limbers (45RA, Korea 1951)
M3 Lee (25th Dragoons, Burma 1944)
Rolls-Royce Armoured Car (10(RN)AMB, German E. Africa 1916)

User avatar
Brian Ostlind
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:56 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Has liked: 617 times
Been liked: 1191 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Brian Ostlind »

1945

Image
epic

Vince Cutajar
Posts: 1720
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Malta
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 1097 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Vince Cutajar »

What's that one with number 898? Pz3 or Pz4?

Vince

User avatar
Brian Ostlind
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:56 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Has liked: 617 times
Been liked: 1191 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Brian Ostlind »

Probably pz4 the gun barrel looks to be larger than any pz3 variant. I don’t know how many pz3s were even around after the war.
epic

Vince Cutajar
Posts: 1720
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Malta
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 1097 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Vince Cutajar »

Pz4 is my second favourite after the Tiger 1. I guess it's from my childhood days when I used to do Airfix models and used to play with them until they broke. Then I would try to convince my father to buy me a new one. He was more into airplanes and ships.

Vince

Stephen White
Site Admin
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:05 pm
Location: Dorset
Has liked: 503 times
Been liked: 1205 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Stephen White »

Sorry Brian, that's just a load of old Wehrmacht junk, shot to pieces by 17 pdrs and air to ground rockets. This is really heaven......

00527058a6c3f0b7580543d403e94b1e.jpg
00527058a6c3f0b7580543d403e94b1e.jpg (120.92 KiB) Viewed 2643 times
DSC05366.jpg
DSC05382.jpg

Sorry, couldn't resist it. Mind you, if you had the contents of your photo available today, you would be a very rich man indeed.

mark lawson
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 9:14 pm
Location: Solihull
Has liked: 1643 times
Been liked: 227 times
Contact:

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by mark lawson »

I'm surprised at you Steven, air to ground rockets were wildly inaccurate the British in 1944 conducted trials with a captured Panther painted white and placed in the middle of an open field, another words a perfect target the RAF then tried to hit the Panther firing a broadside of rockets from all four directions, the results were not good and favoured the Panther if memory serves me right there was less than a 5% chance of being hit by angle rocket from a full salvo of eight rockets on the other hand if a rocket did hit then the results were devastating, being hit by a bomb had even worse results estimations was it took 800 rockets or 3500 bombs to hit a tank in ca combat situation.

I came across a post some years ago by Michael Kenny, try as I have I cant find the post.
Werkstatt - 5, 1/6 Panzer parts. werkstatt.five@gmail.com
RAG Militärmodellbau
IG Militärmodellbau

User avatar
Brian Ostlind
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:56 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Has liked: 617 times
Been liked: 1191 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Brian Ostlind »

What would be the most effective anti tank weapon for a plane to mount? Canons?
epic

mark lawson
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 9:14 pm
Location: Solihull
Has liked: 1643 times
Been liked: 227 times
Contact:

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by mark lawson »

20mm cannons on a Plane were ineffective against armour .50cal even less effective even though US pilots claimed that bouncing rounds off the floor into the belly of a Panzer would knock it out this was not the case not a single German tank was lost to this method even though hundreds of kills were claimed.
Werkstatt - 5, 1/6 Panzer parts. werkstatt.five@gmail.com
RAG Militärmodellbau
IG Militärmodellbau

User avatar
Brian Ostlind
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 6:56 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Has liked: 617 times
Been liked: 1191 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Brian Ostlind »

So carpet bombing I’m guessing then.
epic

User avatar
Chris Hall
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:34 pm
Location: Devizes, Wiltshire, UK
Has liked: 216 times
Been liked: 272 times

Re: Heaven. 1944.

Post by Chris Hall »

Who says you actually have to destroy a tank ? You just need to cause enough peripheral damage (break a track, damage a periscope) to make the crew bail out. Concussion from a near miss could do that, or sheer terror (being under rocket attack would do it for me !).

And there's a world of difference between trying to hit a single vehicle in a field (whatever colour it's painted), and a choked area like Faliase which must have been the ultimate "target rich environment".
Mark IV (Liesel, Abteilung 14, France 1918)
Morris Quad, 25-pdr & 2 x limbers (45RA, Korea 1951)
M3 Lee (25th Dragoons, Burma 1944)
Rolls-Royce Armoured Car (10(RN)AMB, German E. Africa 1916)

Post Reply