Hi Mark,
yes, that's right. If one doesn't use built-in TX-mixers, servo delay, expo functions and so on, the choice of a mode is not so important. But why not using these helpful functions also in a tank?
General functional problems with 2.4 GHz equipment can have 2 other reasons; the cycle time and the signal voltage:
The cycle time means the necessary time for transmitting a whole set of channel signals. Older systems use and need 20 or 30 ms, newer and faster systems using digtal servos use 10 ms or less. The combination of a 10 ms TX / RX and a 20 ms actuator equipment (servos, ESCs and so on) doesn't work together. Some TX / RX systems are reprogrammable for various cycle times.
The signal voltage (NOT the operating voltage!) of the most 2.4 GHz receivers for the HIGH level is only 3 - 3.3 volts, because WLAN technology is used. Older analogous equipment needs 4 volts an more (the so called TTL level). When such an equipment is to be used together with 2.4 GHz, a 'level shifter' between RX and each servo is needed to increase the signal voltage, known as 'servo booster'.
LAST SHIPPING DATE FOR 2019 WILL BE THURSDAY 12TH DECEMBER.
SHIPPING WILL RESUME ON THE 6TH JANUARY 2020.
SHIPPING WILL RESUME ON THE 6TH JANUARY 2020.
Alternative tx controls?
- Gerhard Michel
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:27 pm
- Location: near Nuremberg, Germany
- Been Liked: 50 times
Re: Alternative tx controls?
kind regards
Gerhard
____________________________________________________________________
1/6 Scale models: Jagdpanther (AT), Jagdtiger (BT), Königstiger (Porsche turret, NH), Königstiger (Production turret, BT), Pz. IV (SH)
Gerhard
____________________________________________________________________
1/6 Scale models: Jagdpanther (AT), Jagdtiger (BT), Königstiger (Porsche turret, NH), Königstiger (Production turret, BT), Pz. IV (SH)